A Review Of case laws on bail

A Review Of case laws on bail

Blog Article

Just a couple years ago, searching for case precedent was a hard and time consuming endeavor, demanding folks to search through print copies of case regulation, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a bunch of case law search opportunities, and plenty of sources offer free access to case regulation.

Delay in recording confessional statement may not be treated fatal on the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

four.  It's been noticed by this Court that there is really a delay of in the future from the registration of FIR which has not been explained via the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness on the alleged prevalence as well as the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of your petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened to get the real brothers from the deceased but they didn't respond at all for the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, 1 after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not look much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is no explanation concerning why her arrest was not effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a lot of situations that extra judicial confession of an accused can be a weak type of evidence which can be manoeuvred because of the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution can also be relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning existence of some light on the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners together on the motorcycle at 4.

maintaining the conviction awarded to the appellant reduce the sentence with the appellant from imprisonment for life to at least one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)

R.O, Office, Gujranwala plus the police officials did not inform him that the identification parade from the accused hasn't been conducted still. In the moment case, now the accused made an effort to acquire advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture on the petitioner was widely circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity of your accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance for the accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly with the witness to detect the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer set a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and created pictures. Besides, the images shown about the media reveal that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to hide his identity right until he was put up for an identification parade. Making images of the accused publically, possibly by showing the same to your witness or by publicizing the same in any newspaper or software, would create doubt inside the proceedings of your identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to guarantee that there is no possibility for your witness to begin to see the accused before going to your identification parade. The accused should not be shown to the witness in person or through any other mode, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or the push or electronic media. Offered the reasons elaborated higher than, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.

The case addresses An array of issues such as, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation of the right to life.

Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment with the grid project and submitted that ample mitigation measures were in place to render any opportunity adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted for being designed.

The Court regarded the case for being maintainable under Article 184 (3) Because the Hazard and encroachment alleged were like to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.

after release from the prison he missing interest to contest the instant appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )

Knowledge of the accused is actually a matter to be inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is very hard to get proved otherwise.”

The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information being gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

Whoever, with the intention of causing death here OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to the person, by undertaking an act which inside the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently unsafe that it must in all probability cause death, causes the death with the this kind of person, is claimed to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”

Seek out websites affiliated with trustworthy legal institutions or organizations. Verify the information against other sources when achievable.

The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and prospective hazard to local residents. Ultimately, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, although observing the general development supports that electromagnetic fields have negative effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should adopt the precautionary principle established out within the 1992 Rio Declaration over the Environment and Growth, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby the lack of full scientific certainty should not be used being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.